WebPennsylvania “Fracking” Strict Liability Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss (full article) V. Pun I t I ve Da m a g e s Federal Court Upholds Six-to-One Ratio of Punitives to Compensatories in Exposure Case (full article) VI. st a t u t e o f lI m I tat I ons Ninth Circuit Reinstates Chromium Contamination Claims, Finding Statute
WebNov 16, 2015 · Some argue liability is appropriate if disposal of fracking waste causes earthquakes. Others see a better way to resolve the issue. Earthquake damage in Sparks, Okla., in 2011. WebMar 19, 2015 · The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Democrat from Baltimore County, said the bill is not about banning fracking but holding drilling companies liable if any damage is done to residents and their property. “All strict liability means is if you can prove the company caused the contamination, the company is responsible,” said Zirkin. newbedford public schools.com
Edwards’ attempt to weaken fracking liability bill fails
Web"To borrow from Mr. Lipstein, courts should impose strict liability for earthquake damage in part to compel oil and gas companies to modify their fracking and disposal techniques 'so this will not happen.'" Courts have been asked since the 19th century to impose strict liability for damages from oil and gas activities. WebSep 22, 2024 · Fracking can go ahead in England, the government said on Thursday, lifting a ban on the controversial process. ... Even with the reversal of the ban, permit arrangements still remain very strict. Webthis energy production method to strict scrutiny. A fairly detailed explanation of hydrofracking is necessary to inform the legal determination of whether energy production companies should be subjected to strict liability. This note will then briefly outline the history of the strict liability doctrine. newbedfordcu